The Gaming Act is still not regulated, and it will not happen for the time being, a tour of journalists teaches us. The latest news (or rather the defect on it) predict little change: the Gaming Act is probably not renewed before 2020 or even 2021. How come?
The KOA Act
The new gambling law is actually not a new law. It is an adjustment to an old law. That is why it is also called modernization or regulation. This is because it is about the "remote chance of gambling" (KOA). This means: games of chance that are offered outside the USA, but that can be reached for Dutch people. You guessed it: via the internet.
Gambling on the internet has been unregulated for about 20 years (the moment it started to arise), and therefore according to the Dutch law, illegal. The EU thinks differently, but believes that the Dutch government should hurry to put its own legislation in order.
With a new law, all providers must go through a license procedure. In addition, they must hand over part of the income to an addiction fund. And they must pay 29% tax to the state. In exchange, they can advertise their product on TV, in the newspaper, on the radio and on the street. In addition to advertising on the internet.
Delay, delay
In 2017, more than a year ago, the amendment was already adopted by Parliament (the House of Representatives) with a large majority. But then it stranded in the Senate, which seemed to be in Fast payouthurry with its treatment. The CDA in particular encouraged a delay by asking many questions about the subject before processing it.
A new government, which was also slowly created due to a long -running coalition formation, once again threw the file back.
Now, in 2018, the subject is still not on the agenda of the newly chosen Senate. The current responsible minister - Sander Dekker - has hardly read in the subject. As always, there are first more important things than the GOK file. And so the hoped year 2019 does not seem feasible. Even 2020 is a difficult target with the current pace.
Missed income
For many parties it is a thorn in the eye. Foreign companies that would like to raise customers in the USA have been waiting for the modernization of the Gok Act for years. Now it is only for the licensed, state providers to advertise in the news. Like Holland. But even Holland casino Would like a regulation of the online market, because it also wants to reach its customers in this way. For the state itself, the current online market is an evil genius: it does not get tax revenues from this playing field. That is only possible when the legislation is there.
The delay is also painful for the already playing consumer. After all, it benefits from a safe and fair supply, and that can be better maintained by the authorities in a new law is also the hinterland (business and sports branch) in the USA, which would benefit from a regulation, not happy with the current one situation. Consider, for example, the online marketing world that sees many advertising revenues passing by at the moment, but also to the troubled professional football world. Ajax, PSV and Feyenoord alone are now missing millions of $a year due to the failure of a modern gambling law.
Opponents
Opponents of the regulation see a new law on the games of chance would rather never come. They ask themselves: is it perhaps good that the Gaming Act is not modernized, and everything stays with the old? Does a regulation of remote gambling work further gambling addiction and more Dutch gamblers in the hand, something that nobody should want, given that gambling is often not a profitable hobby? There may be something to be said for it, but the reality offers the only truth. Gambling is simply popular, and nowadays especially on the internet. More than 500,000 Dutch people play online regularly, and they always find their way. Legal or illegal, it doesn't matter to them. In essence, they are also right. Many online providers are large, professional companies that deal with customers seriously and, for example, the Holland CasiFast payoutin that sense have already been over.
What does it mean for you as a player?
As mentioned earlier, you as an online gambler would like to play safely and honestly. You don't want to be tampered with the games or with your money. You want to be paid neatly with a nice win. This is also the case with 97 out of 100 parties. But what if there is a party that is not neat, and where filthy practices take place? In such a case, you could go to the authorities with regulated legislation to indicate the party in question. He may then lose his license and gets a big fine. And you may get your money back, or you can at least go to court for that. But at the moment, because the market is not regulated, the authorities cannot start anything. The companies behind the online bookmakers and casinos are not in the USA, but abroad. And there is Fast payoutjurisdiction.
Yet it makes Fast payoutbig difference for you as a player, outside of an incidental safety issue. At the moment you as a Dutchman can always play online. That is because according to the EU legislation, which is above national legislation, there is a free movement of citizens, goods and services. So you can decide for yourself where you surf or what you make your money to. There is nobody who can forbid you. If you want Gambling, guess!
I am smart and always read the review about an online casiFast payoutfirst. And always apply your critical eye yourself: which casiFast payoutfeels like reliable, and which is not? If something sounds like too good to be true, it is often the case. So use a good manual, and use your own mind!